Temple Garden Chambers is a leading common law set based in London and The Hague.
With excellence from top to bottom Chambers provides a first class service in a number of different fields.
Home /
Finding of fundamental dishonesty against an opportunistic claimant who knew how to try and work the compensation system, but whose dishonesty was uncovered after being ‘tied up in knots’. James Henry – Instructed by Katie Islip of Horwich Farrelly.
Findings of fundamental dishonesty against two claimants and an enforceable order for indemnity costs in a case involving late intimation and FNOL call recordings. (Instructed by Leah Whitehead of Horwich Farrelly.)
Dishonest injury claim dismissed following concessions of dishonest evidence during cross-examination. (Instructed by Jessica Bradley of Horwich Farrelly.)
Findings of fundamental dishonesty against claimants who had staged a collision with the First Defendant. Inconsistent routes, mapping evidence and adverse inferences were all crucial to the success. (Instructed by Karen Mann of Horwich Farrelly.)
Claim dismissed on the basis of fundamentally dishonest evidence about gym attendance and injuries sustained. James Henry was instructed by Katie Islip of Horwich Farrelly.
Finding of fundamental dishonesty following discontinuance by the Claimant, after it was discovered that the claimant had submitted a false repair invoice. (Instructed by Karen Mann of Horwich Farrelly.)
Fundamental dishonesty in relation to the Claimant’s injury claim led to the dismissal of otherwise recoverable credit hire charges of c.£10k pursuant to s.57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. (James Henry Instructed by Gemma Day of Horwich…
Finding of fundamental dishonesty in a causation dispute where the claimant alleged ongoing pain for over three years following an accident in a car park. (Instructed by Aysha Ahmad of Horwich Farrelly.)
Dismissal of claim following fundamentally dishonest evidence on liability. Instructed by Bradley Sutcliffe of Horwich Farrelly.
Finding of fundamental dishonesty following discontinuance by the claimant prior to the amendment of the defence. Instructed by Karen Mann of Horwich Farrelly.
