Home / Cases / R (Bailey & Morris) v Secretary of State for Justice

R (Bailey & Morris) v Secretary of State for Justice


[2023] EWHC 555 (Admin)
Dates of case

High profile judicial review claim concerning the Secretary of State for Justice’s decision to amend the Parole Board Rules and to issue guidance about the effect of the amendment.   The rule change, which was made without consultation, purported to prohibit MOJ staff from stating in their reports their views on the “ultimate issue” – the suitability of the prisoner for release into the community.  The MOJ issued accompanying guidance going beyond this restriction, based on the incorrect belief that the rule change prohibited MOJ witnesses from giving “ultimate issue” evidence in any context, even where directed to do so by the Parole Board.   The High Court held that the rule change amounted to an unlawful interference with the independent judicial determination of the legality of detention, contrary to common law and/or Article 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and was irrational.  It also held that the guidance was unlawful.   The Court adjourned the hearing for consideration of issues of relief and costs, and for submissions on the question of whether non-compliance with the Parole Board’s directions amounts to a contempt of court.  

The press report can be found here
The judgment can be found here

Related Barristers

Environmental Law
Health & Safety
Public Law

Nicholas Chapman

Call 2001

Read more

Extradition & Interpol
Public Law

Myles Grandison

Call 2002

Read more

Related Practice Areas

Public Law



Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)