Home / Cases / R v F

R v F


Dates of case

Simon Browne QC, instructed by Andrew Dalton of White Dalton Motor Cycle Solicitors settled the Claimant’s claim for £1.65 million following an RTA in 2014. The Claimant was already paraplegic as the result of a previous RTA in 2008. The case raised interesting questions of acceleration in paraplegia cases, and how to approach quantitative rather than qualitative differences in care needs as a result of a Defendant’s negligence.

Before 2014 the Claimant was a fit and independent paraplegic. After the second accident his abilities changed significantly. For example, as a result of an injury sustained to his dominant wrist in the second accident he is no longer able to transfer unaided. Relying on Reaney v University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust & Anr [2015] EWCA Civ 119, the Claimant argued that as a result of the 2014 accident his needs were qualitatively different from his pre-existing needs. The Defendant argued that his paraplegia meant that he would eventually need care anyway, and that it was merely a question of when.

Related Practice Areas

Personal Injury



Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)