Temple Garden Chambers is a leading common law set based in London and The Hague.
With excellence from top to bottom Chambers provides a first class service in a number of different fields.
Lionel Stride (instructed by Kevin Coakley at Horwich Farrelly) represented the Defendant in an amputee case pleaded at £7.5 million. The main areas of dispute centred on the extent and cost of the care regime; single-level accommodation; future work capacity;…
D conceded liability for an assault on eve of trial. C sustained injury in an alleged assault whilst being escorted out of a summer ball by D’s security guards. D denied that any assault took place and alleged fundamental dishonesty…
Saoirse is instructed by the Ministry of Defence in the Independent Inquiry relating to Afghanistan, which is investigating alleged war crimes committed by British Special Forces in Afghanistan.
Saoirse successfully resisted the Government of Turkey’s appeal against Mr Demir’s extradition before a Divisional Court in the lead case concerning Article 3 ECHR and prison conditions. Dingemans LJ and Stacey J upheld DJ Heptonstall’s order to discharge Mr Demir…
Saoirse represented Mr Urbonas in and was being led by Jonathan Hall KC. This case was the lead case on Lithuanian prison conditions. Relying on the 2023 CPT report, the Appellants argued that there was a real risk of Article…
Zeenat is currently instructed as sole counsel for three core participants (three Integrated Care Boards) in the Lampard Inquiry, a statutory inquiry investigating mental health deaths in Essex.
Anthony represented the Claimant in his successful dismissal of the Defendant’s appeal against a determination that a General Surgeon’s evidence in relation to causation in a travel sickness claim was not inadmissible in spite of the Defendant’s criticism of its…
Anthony acted for the successful Respondent who had been involved in a slipping accident at the Defendant’s holiday resort. Butterfield J. upheld the trial judge’s imposition of liability on the basis that the Defendant’s inspection regime was insufficient and that…
Anthony acted for the Claimant/Appellant in the Court of Appeal in this case in which their Lordships gave guidance upon the approach the appellate courts should take to appeals on questions of contested fact that have been determined by the…
Anthony acted for the successful Respondent in the Court of Appeal in this case which sought to explore the correct interpretation and the validity of a Claimant’s Part 36 offer for the purposes of determining whether the costs consequences set…
