Temple Garden Chambers is a leading common law set based in London and The Hague.
With excellence from top to bottom Chambers provides a first class service in a number of different fields.
James acted for the Claimant who suffered Naproxen-induced renal failure as a result of a chronic pain condition arising from an accident at work. All aspects of the case were in dispute and the Defendant alleged fundamental dishonesty. The claim…
The case involved a rare form of PPPD that resulted in the claimant collapsing when exposed to complicated patterns and complex visual scenes. The disputes centred on fundamental dishonesty and contested audiovestibular and neuropsychiatric expert evidence. A compromise was agreed…
James represented the Claimant at her successful split trial on liability in 2023 and later at the quantum ENE in 2025. The claimant suffered a mild TBI but went on to develop focal epilepsy with visual hallucinations, chronic pain and…
£650,000 settlement in an interesting liability and quantum dispute involving a young croupier at a top Mayfair casino whose ability to progress through the ranks of his profession was curtailed by a progressive ankle injury requiring multiple surgeries at key…
Acted for the Defendant in a claim pleaded at £1.8M involving neurological, spinal and psychiatric injuries, including an instability in the structures of C1/2, trigeminal nerve pain and PTSD. C had been a nurse. Her pleaded case was that she…
Acted for the Claimant who suffered serious orthopaedic and urological injuries. The primary dispute was whether C was able to continue working as a production operative in a car factory (albeit with ‘restricted worker’ status), or whether she was entitled…
Acted for the Claimant, a 21-year-old man who was injured in a motorbike accident, leaving him without fine motor skill in his non-dominant hand. C did not have formal qualifications, but had been working as part of an Ambulance crew…
Acted for the Defendant in this traumatic brain injury claim involving contested evidence from neurologists, neuropsychologists and neuropsychiatrists. C’s case was advanced at just under £1M, the bulk of which related to loss of earnings as the head of design…
Acted for the Claimant who injured his ankle in a motorbike accident aged 16. The only significant dispute between the parties was whether C would have had a successful career professional rugby league player. C advanced a loss of chance…
Acted for claimant, a 73-year-old man who suffered spinal injuries after a workplace fall from height. Contributory negligence and causation in were dispute. C made a remarkable recovery in the circumstances, but maintained that he would have continued to work…
