Temple Garden Chambers is a leading common law set based in London and The Hague.
With excellence from top to bottom Chambers provides a first class service in a number of different fields.
The lead case concerning the validity of European Arrest Warrants issued by Germany, following the CJEU’s decision (in joined cases C-508/18 and C-82/19/PPU, OG and PI) that warrants issued by German Public Prosecutors were invalid. The Divisional Court gave important…
Leading Divisional Court decision concerning the compatibility of prison conditions in Romania with Article 3 of the ECHR. Émilie was in instructed for the Requested Person and led by Edward Fitzgerald QC.
Leading Divisional Court decision concerning the compatibility of prison conditions in France with Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Émilie was instructed for the Requested Person and led by Alison Macdonald QC.
Leading Divisional Court decision concerning the technical requirements of European Arrest Warrants. Émilie appeared alone against Clare Montgomery QC.
Instructed on behalf of Dr Dusko Knezevic, a leading figure in Montenegro, in the extradition request by the Government of Montenegro before UK courts.
In the first and, perhaps, only UK extradition case to be considered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) the Divisional Court (Simon LJ and William Davis J) has referred the following questions; “Where surrender is sought…
The two requested persons appealed to the High Court against the decision to order their extradition to Italy. The case concerned the application of section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003 where the requested persons’ conviction in Italy became final…
Saoirse was junior counsel representing one of the Appellants in this appeal before a Divisional Court. The issues decided were: a) whether inter-prisoner violence is such that a violation of Article 3 ECHR can be found; and b) disclosure in…
Saoirse was junior counsel acting for Mr Lange. This was the lead case before a Divisional Court (including the Lord Chief Justice) which determined whether extradition to Poland in all “accusation” cases would be halted. The Appellants argued that due…
Saoirse successfully represented the Appellant whose appeal was allowed on Article 8 ECHR grounds in light of the Appellant’s vulnerabilities having been a victim of trafficking and forced labour.
