Year of Call: 1987
Practice Areas
Mark James, MA (Oxon), was called to the Bar in 1987. He is recognised as an expert in the field of costs and also conducts professional negligence claims involving barristers and solicitors. He has extensive experience in insurance-backed litigation including personal injury (especially high-value claims and disease litigation), insurance contract disputes and claims for fire and subsidence damage to property and business (including subrogated claims). He also undertakes construction work and general commercial work. He was counsel in the leading case on fundamental dishonesty, LOCOG v Sinfield [2018] EWHC 51. He is the author of the leading textbook on experts, Expert Evidence: Law and Practice (4th ed., 2014)(Sweet and Maxwell).
Costs
Mark James is recognised as an expert in the field of costs and has appeared in some of the leading cases on champerty, solicitors’ retainers and other solicitor-client disputes. He frequently appears in applications for wasted and non-party costs. He represented both claimants and defendants in the cost budgeting pilot schemes for defamation and in the TCC and continues to do so now that cost budgeting is generally in use. He is commonly asked to advise in cases that raise complicated legal and technical issues (such as whether CFAs can be assigned) and has a reputation for providing incisive and practical advice. He has created a niche in the field of costs and is recommended in this area by ‘The Legal 500’ and ‘Chambers UK’. As a result of this expertise he is also frequently instructed in professional negligence claims and disciplinary matters involving claims against solicitors and/or barristers.
Personal Injury
His personal injury work (which includes clinical negligence) is spread evenly between claimants and defendants. He has developed a specialism in asbestos-related and other disease claims including radiation exposure during the British Atomic Bomb tests in the South Pacific in the 1950s, a case that went to the Supreme Court. He undertakes high-value injury claims (including brain injury cases).
Insurance
Specialises in fire and property damage claims and policy disputes.
Commercial
He has handled freezing injunctions and injunctions to restrain breach of confidence, claims against fraudulent company directors (including claims under the Insolvency Act 1986) and disputes between shareholders and/or company directors as well as breach of contract claims for sales of goods and services and building and partnership disputes.
“He has the brain the size of the planet and is brilliant on very technical issues” and “An excellent technical lawyer and a good advocate who gives good quality, clear and concise advice.”
Chambers UK (2016)
“He has a voraciously academic approach.”
Legal 500 (2015)
PIBA
Undertakes Public Access work
First High Court decision addressing issues concerning “fundamental dishonesty” within the scope of section 57 Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015.
Read moreWhether members of the armed services were ‘employees’ within CPR 45 Part IV. The outcome affected the size of the success fee.
Six day trial on the meaning and effect of terms and conditions in an ‘all risks’ commercial property insurance policy.
The meaning of ‘special circumstances’ within the context of the ‘one-fifth rule’ governing costs in solicitor-client detailed assessments.
Whether CPR r. 35.13 contained a ‘sanction’ for which relief must be sought when a party failed to serve an expert’s report in time.
Meaning of the word ‘disease’ in CPR r. 45.23. The outcome affected the size of the success fee.
Circumstances in which discretion to vary an order under CPR r. 3.1(7) should be exercised.
Large group litigation claim on behalf of servicemen allegedly exposed to radiation from nuclear weapons during military testing in the 1950s – difficult points of law on s. 14 & s. 33 Limitation Act 1980 that reached the Supreme Court.
Whether the trial judge was right to exclude DNA evidence linking defendant to murder weapon in a Fatal Accidents claim.
Whether the court has any discretion to disallow interest due on a solicitor’s bill to its client in non-contentious work
Whether a solicitor’s indemnity against other side’s costs was void under the law of champerty.
Application of res ipsa loquitur principle to establish cause of a fire.
10th December 2018
Please see link below to the latest update from the TGC Costs Team.
1st December 2014
The leading textbook on the law as it applies to experts (including bias, expert immunity and the admissibility of expert evidence) and procedural rules across civil, criminal and family proceedings.
10th December 2018
Please see link below to the latest update from the TGC Costs Team.
22nd January 2018
James Laughland, instructed by Roger Jones of Kennedys Law LLP, acted for the appellant who successfully challenged the trial judge’s finding that whilst there had been dishonesty, there had not been “fundamental dishonesty” within the scope of section 57 Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015. Mark James, also of Temple Garden Chambers, acted for the Respondent. Both had appeared at trial and on appeal
Read more16th May 2016
Mark James, instructed by Stewart-Moore Solicitors, advised the well-known horse trainer Jim Best on the issue of apparent bias when it emerged that the chairman of the British Horseracing Association Disciplinary Panel that convicted him of misconduct and banned him for 4 years had the BHA as a client.
Read moreThank you for choosing to instruct me in your case. I will need to collect and hold your personal information in order to represent you. I will take all possible steps to protect your personal information. I am determined to do nothing that would infringe your rights or undermine your trust. This Privacy Notice describes the information I collect about you, how it is used and shared, and your rights regarding it.
I am registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) as a Data Controller for the personal data that I hold and process as a barrister. My registered address is Temple Garden Chambers, London EC4Y 9DA.
The vast majority of the information that I hold about you is provided to or gathered in the course of your case and/or proceedings. Your solicitor and/or I will tell you why we need the information and how we will use it. Typically I will need the information to advise you about your case, represent you in court and/or to draft documents (including court documents) on your behalf.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires all organisations that process personal data to have a Lawful Basis for doing so. Ordinarily my Lawful Basis is likely to be one or more of the following five reasons:
Some of the information you provide to me (e.g. copies of your medical records and details of your address and date of birth) is likely to be in a ‘special category’ of personal data. Usually I will process this data for one or more of the following reasons:
I use your information to:
I do not use automated decision-making in the processing of your personal data.
I collect and process both personal data and special categories of personal data as defined in the GDPR. This includes:
I may share your personal data with:
I do not transfer any personal data to third countries or international organisations.
I retain your personal data while you remain a client unless you ask me to delete it. My Retention and Disposal Policy (copy available on request) details how long I hold data for and how I dispose of it when it no longer needs to be held. Generally I will hold you data for at least 7 years. I will delete or anonymise your information at your request unless:
The General Data Protection Regulation gives you specific rights around your personal data. For example, you have to be informed about the information I hold and what I use it for, you can ask for a copy of the personal information I hold about you, you can ask us to correct any inaccuracies with the personal data I hold, you can ask us to stop sending you direct mail, or emails, or in some circumstances ask us to stop processing your details. Finally, if I do something irregular or improper with your personal data you can seek compensation for any distress you are caused or loss you have incurred. You can find out more information from the ICO’s website http://ico.org.uk/for_the_public/personal_information and this is the organisation that you can complain to if you are unhappy with how I dealt with you.
You may request access to, correction of, or a copy of your information by contacting me at Temple Garden Chambers, London EC4Y 9DA or clerks@tgchambers.com.
You may opt out of receiving emails and other messages from my Chambers by following the instructions in those messages.
Cookies are small text files that are stored on your browser or device by websites, apps, online media, and advertisements. The Chambers website use cookies to:
I will occasionally update my Privacy Notice. When I make significant changes, I will notify you of these through either mail or email. I will also publish the updated Notice on my website profile.
