Year of Call: 2002
Practice Areas
Michael has for many years worked successfully both remotely and electronically. In the present climate he is very comfortable receiving all papers electronically and has facilities to undertake conferences with clients, experts and insurers via e- conferencing, including video, Skpe and WhatsApp. Despite the unusual and difficult present situation Michael can continue to provide a fully comprehensive service.
Michael Rapp specialises in Personal Injury, Professional/Clinical Negligence, Product Liability, Insurance litigation; particularly road traffic fraud, Cable Damage claims and Utility matters. He has an even split of work for both sides and prides himself in taking a forensic and highly collaborative team approach to cases, resulting in a loyal and strong client base. He prides himself on his repeat instructions over many years from top tier PI firms.
Claimant
Michael specialises in higher value cases in the Multi Track. He believes that it is essential that the personal context of any individual’s injury is brought to the fore from the outset. An injury occurs to a person within the context of their family, work and social life. Michael’s firm view is that it is the responsibility of the claimant’s legal team to set out and explain to the defendant insurer, and subsequently the court, the full context and consequences of any injury to a claimant as an individual as soon as possible.
He takes a modern approach to pleadings believing that they are integral to bringing the case to life and allowing the parties and the court to appreciate a deeper understanding of the individual claimant themselves at an early stage. Michael, and the legal teams that he works with, have seen great success in the use of early, detailed and well-reasoned schedules resulting in settlement of high value claims within limitation, avoiding the need for any court involvement at all.
In line with this Michael strongly believes in the power of rehabilitation at an early stage and the absolute necessity of a collaborative approach between claimant and defendant legal teams in cases involving serious or catastrophic injuries.
His claimant practice involves regular instruction from some of the best known claimant solicitor firms. Michael prides himself on being able to add value to claims and to explore elements of the claim whose long term financial impact that may not have been fully considered. Equally he often deals with claims involving potential Ogden handicap on the open labour market claims. He promotes an integrated approach harnessing the combined expertise of the legal team with the necessary experts; be they medical, financial or employment.
Michael is well versed in the more complex claimant personal injury work including catastrophic or life threatening injuries, chronic or complex regional pain and somatoform type cases and industrial disease (asbestos, heavy metal etc.). He also has experience of cases involving complex injuries including those of a psychiatric nature to children and the subtleties and delicacies of injuries occurring to children with pre-existing conditions.
Defendant
Michael has a strong defendant personal injury practice often complimenting his insurance practice. Michael strongly believes that the legal team for the defendant cannot be passive in high value claims. Action to rehabilitate claimants both personally and back into the workplace is of benefit to both parties. Claimants who refuse to co-operate in this regard should expect that to be reflected in the final damages of their claim. Michael advises early and assertive response (when possible) by the defendant client/ insurer.
He is regularly instructed on behalf of some of the UK’s largest construction/home building companies in relation to employee and public liability claims. Michael regularly advises on the merits and tactical value of the full range of resources open to a defendant insurer defending a personal injury claim. His motor fraud practice allows him to cast a highly critical and analytical eye upon all claims.
Michael is regularly instructed to draft robust counter-schedules serving as a reality check to schedules often served at well over 7 figures. Michael strongly believes that there is room for showing genuine compassion and understanding to the claimant but at the same time tenaciously ensuring that a settlement that is reasonable, but no more, is achieved for the defendant insurer.
Michael is happy to be instructed later on in the process recognising commercial realities within the insurance industry and regularly attends JSMs on behalf of insurers where he will achieve significant reductions. Michael will also explore wider ranging settlements beyond the injuries themselves where the client wishes to see finality. For example, recent consent orders have resolved outstanding employment issues that have existed, allowing both sides complete finality of both the injury and the employment.
Michael is instructed on both sides of the fence and his practice is generally focused upon solicitor’s negligence particularly resulting from underlying personal injury claims. Recent cases have involved defending, and settling for £120,000, a case pleaded in excess of £500,000 for an ex-RAF officer whose case had originally been struck out.
Michael’s practice in this regard compliments that of his personal injury practice. It is predominantly for claimants and includes cases involving death in hospital and possible failure to identify cancer leading to amputation of the leg.
Michael is known within Motor Insurance for his fraud and LVI practice. He works exclusively for defending insurers in this regard. Earlier this year he successfully persuaded a judge to strike out a claim at trial with an ensuing enforceable cost order where the court was satisfied the accident was a deliberate slam on and in which the judge was further satisfied that the claimant had also then deliberately damaged his vehicle after the accident.
Michael is well versed in detailed and highly analytical pleadings setting out the exact position in relation to fraud. Such defences have had a high strike rate in seeing would be claimants electing to discontinue rather than running the risks of a finding of fraud/fundamental dishonesty.
Michael receives regular instructions in relation to defective products and claims under the Consumer Protection Act and the Sale of Goods Act. Recent cases have included exploding microwave ovens and fires arising from lithium-ion batteries.
College of Law BVC
University of Bristol Joint Honours French and Italian
PIBA
Very recent case for the defendant in a claim involving a significant shoulder injury to a scaffolder. The claimant was seeking an Ogden 8 claim for handicap on the labour market and an inability to work more than 2 days a week. The schedule was accordingly pleaded at just over £536,000. Claim settled on the basis of an old style Smith v Manchester award and the claimant returning to full time work in a year. Settlement reached at £245,000
The claimant suffered life threatening injuries within an industrial accident. Early involvement and a unified approach by the Defendant legal team pushed a JSM at the earliest opportunity on the claimant’s evidence alone. A reasonable compromise at the lower end of the scale was achieved, allowing the claimant the benefit of finality and the defendant to see a very significant saving in legal costs and resolution of the claimant’s employment. Claim pleaded at over £500,000, settlement reached at £230,000.
Michel acted for the Defendant in this claim for 2 manual handing accidents at work. Surveillance indicated that the claimant had exaggerated the effect of the accident, taking advantage of sick absence to attend a job interview. However there was no exaggeration with regard to the occurrence of the accidents or that injury had been sustained. At trial after just over an hour of cross examination as to the claimant’s credibility and veracity in light of the exaggeration revealed on the surveillance the claimant sought an adjournment during which he discontinued his claim.
A claim by an ex RAF serviceman was struck out due to failings by his original solicitors. Duty, causation and quantum were all very much in dispute. The claim was pleaded in the region of £500,000. An early realistic part 36 offer combined with a combative counter-schedule saw settlement reached at £120,000.
Michael defended this claim brought by Virgin for damage to a fibre optic cable crushed during the development of housing by one of Barratt sub-contractors.
Read moreMichael acted for the defendant in a Multi Track personal injury claim where as a result of investigations into medical and DWP records the claimant’s significant history of street and prescribed drug addiction was discovered
Read moreA workplace claim by a young woman who alleged she had suffered Thoracic Outlet Syndrome as a result of a manual handling accident at work. Her claim was initially pleaded on the basis that her ability to work had been permanently compromised. Michael represented the defendant employer where the choice of experts was key to the claim. Michael drafted the agendas for the joint statements which were ultimately devastating for the claimant. As a result of their impact the claimant eventually capitulated and agreed to withdraw her claim shortly before trial and pay the defendants’ costs up to the value of her ATE insurance.
A long running fraud case defended upon the basis of a deliberate slam on accident where the claimant had deliberately further damaged his vehicle after the accident. The case involved numerous interlocutory skirmishes by the claimant. Ultimately having heard the claimant’s evidence under cross examination at trial the court struck the claim out upon the basis that it was overwhelmingly tainted with fraud. Thus the claimant lost all QWOCs cost protection.
Acted for a young female graduate who suffered a significant foot injury. She faced an inevitable future of arthritis in the ankle and foot. The case centered upon whether she would be Ogden 7 disabled and given the nascent level of her career whether there would be an impact on her. A quirk was that she was also moving to the USA at the time of the accident and her career model was therefore somewhat unusual. Schedule pleaded at £470,500 and concluded at JSM. Settlement reached at £243,189
The claimant suffered a complex knee injury and the value of the claim centered on his handicap on the open labour market and his future loss; the claimant having worked almost exclusively for his working life as a Postman. The claimant was 53 at the time of settlement, with a Royal Mail pension commencing at the age of 60. The schedule was pleaded at just under £280,000 and settlement was achieved at £201,500 at JSM.
Acted for the claimant in a case involving an ambulance worker run over by her own ambulance. Liability was disputed on this basis that no mechanical defect with the ambulance was ever identified. Eventually a few months before trial an admission of liability was made after concerted pressure in relation to specific disclosure regarding handbrake problems with sister ambulances within the fleet.
A non resolved soft tissue injury led to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Schedule pleaded at £236,321, case settled shortly before trial for £175,000.
A tragic case involving the death of an HGV driver with a young family. The case was pleaded at over £1million and the claimant was represented by Queen’s Counsel. Michael represented one of 2 defendants and the claim settled at JSM for £415,000.
The case explored various long term dependency issues, Cookson v Knowles and contribution issues between defendants.
15th September 2022
Welcome to the inaugural issue of the TGC Personal Injury newsletter.
15th September 2022
Welcome to the inaugural edition of the TGC Personal Injury newsletter.
12th February 2021
Michael Rapp and Ian Whitaker of Irwin Mitchell received the judgement of HHJ Bloom on 12 February 2021 arising from a highly contested 4 day trial conducted remotely at Luton CC in January 2021.
Read more6th December 2019
Michael Rapp, and his instructing solicitor Christopher Kardhaji of Irwin Mitchell, Sheffield, received judgment in a 3 day case in Southend county court in front of HHJ Holmes. C suffered a significant whiplash injury. On her case she suffered a significant peripheral nerve injury that affected the function of her left arm. Whilst she remained capable of day to day activities she asserted that had the accident not occurred she would have returned to work after a career break looking after her family. On her case she would have returned to work as a Legal Secretary at a US law firm. Within a few years she would have been earning £70,000 gross. Instead as a result of her restricted hand and arm function she was restricted to working as an administrator for her husband’s car repair shop earning no more than £12,000 p.a.
Read more22nd July 2019
Michael Rapp successfully concluded a settlement in an industrial accident involving an apprentice who suffered horrific body burns resulting in Critical Illness Neuropathy and below waist paralysis.
Read moreThank you for choosing to instruct me in your case. I will need to collect and hold your personal information in order to represent you. I will take all possible steps to protect your personal information. I am determined to do nothing that would infringe your rights or undermine your trust. This Privacy Notice describes the information I collect about you, how it is used and shared, and your rights regarding it.
I am registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) as a Data Controller for the personal data that I hold and process as a barrister. My registered address is Temple Garden Chambers, London EC4Y 9DA and my registration number is Z2999728.
The vast majority of the information that I hold about you is provided to or gathered by us in the course of your case and/or proceedings. Your solicitor and/or I will tell you why we need the information and how we will use it.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires all organisations that process personal data to have a Lawful Basis for doing so. The Lawful Bases identified in the GDPR are:
Examples of legitimate interests include:
Ordinarily my Lawful Basis is likely to be one of the following four reasons:
To protect the vital interests of a data subject or another person
I do not use automated decision-making in the processing of your personal data.
I collect and process both personal data and special categories of personal data as defined in the GDPR. This includes:
I do not transfer any personal data to third countries or international organisations.
I retain your personal data while you remain a client unless you ask me to delete it. My Retention and Disposal Policy (copy available on request) details how long I hold data for and how I dispose of it when it no longer needs to be held. I will delete or anonymise your information at your request unless:
The General Data Protection Regulation gives you specific rights around your personal data. For example, you have to be informed about the information I hold and what I use it for, you can ask for a copy of the personal information I hold about you, you can ask us to correct any inaccuracies with the personal data I hold, you can ask us to stop sending you direct mail, or emails, or in some circumstances ask us to stop processing your details. Finally, if I do something irregular or improper with your personal data you can seek compensation for any distress you are caused or loss you have incurred. You can find out more information from the ICO’s website http://ico.org.uk/for_the_public/personal_information and this is the organisation that you can complain to if you are unhappy with how I dealt with you.
You may request access to, correction of, or a copy of your information by contacting me at Temple Garden Chambers, London EC4Y 9DA or clerks@tgchambers.com.
You may opt out of receiving emails and other messages from my Chambers by following the instructions in those messages.
Cookies are small text files that are stored on your browser or device by websites, apps, online media, and advertisements. The Chambers website use cookies to:
I will occasionally update my Privacy Notice. When I make significant changes, I will notify you of these through either mail or email. I will also publish the updated Notice on my website profile.
