News & Resources

Tina Norman v Robert Norman Court of Appeal

25th January 2017

On 19 January 2017, Matt Waszak, instructed by the Bar Pro Bono Unit, acted for the appellant in an application before the Court of Appeal (Gloster (Vice President), King, Lewison LJJ) to preserve the anonymity of appeal proceedings in an ancillary relief case.

The substantive appeal before the Court concerned the terms of a financial remedy order made in the context of divorce proceedings in 2005. The appellant wife alleged that the order had been made following fraudulent misrepresentations by the respondent husband as to the position of his finances.

Anonymity was granted by the Court of Appeal in 2011, in the context of different appeal proceedings. It was preserved in 2014 in the context of another appeal. However, full argument on the issue of anonymity had never been previously heard and the press had never been afforded the opportunity to contest the point. At a previous hearing, at which Emily Wilsdon appeared for the appellant, Macur LJ preserved anonymity on an interim basis, pending full argument on the issue at the permission to appeal/appeal hearing.

Full argument on the issue of anonymity was heard before the Court of Appeal.  A number of different media organisations (the Times Newspapers Limited, Associated Newspapers Limited, Telegraph Newspapers Limited, News Group Newspapers Limited, Sky News) sought for anonymity to be lifted. The case formed the subject of prior reporting because of a potential expectation amongst practitioners that the Court of Appeal might resolve two divergent High Court judgments (those of Mostyn J in L v L [2015] EWHC 2621; and that of Holman J in Luckwell v Limata [2014] EWHC 526 (Fam))on the issue of whether appeal ancillary relief proceedings should be anonymous; and because of the possibility that the Court could depart from it usual position in anonymising appeal proceedings in an ancillary case (K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550).

For reasons that will be provided in a reserved judgment, the Court lifted the anonymity order that was previously made. These proceedings have since been the subject of extensive media coverage, in both national and local media.

Judgment was handed down by the Court on 08.02.17. A copy of the judgment can be read here.

Related Barristers

Matthew Waszak

Matthew Waszak
Year of Call: 2012

Emily Wilsdon

Emily Wilsdon
Year of Call: 2011

Close X

TEMPLE GARDEN CHAMBERS is a market leading set with recognised excellence in a myriad of practice areas with awarded leaders in twelve specialist areas. TGC has the privilege of being well placed in the Temple and The Hague with superb facilities.

Currently consisting of 17 silks and 60 juniors with outstanding leadership and a long established clerking team acknowledged for their exceptional client services and business development, we are keen to expand upon our key areas.

To accommodate the growth in our core practice areas we are inviting applications from established practitioners and/or teams to further enhance our excellent reputation in the following fields:

• Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence
• Inquests & Inquiries
• Health & Safety
• Costs & Litigation Funding

TGC is widely recognised for its friendly ethos and its commitment to Equality & Diversity and Wellbeing. We are especially keen to encourage applications from underrepresented groups at the bar – women, people with disabilities, those from ethnic minority groups and members of the LGBTQ+ community.

Applications will be treated with the strictest confidence and should be addressed to the Head of Chambers, Keith Morton QC

In advance of any formal application both Keith Morton QC and Dean Norton (Senior Clerk) would be delighted to have a confidential discussion. To arrange a meeting please contact Dean on 020 7842 8641 or