Temple Garden Chambers is a leading common law set based in London and The Hague.
With excellence from top to bottom Chambers provides a first class service in a number of different fields.
Thank you for choosing to instruct me in your case. I will need to collect and hold your personal information in order to represent you. I will take all reasonable steps to protect your personal information. I will do all that I reasonably can to ensure I do not infringe your rights or undermine your trust. This Privacy Notice describes the information I collect about you, how it is used and shared, and your rights regarding it.
Data Controller
I am registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) as a Data Controller for the personal data that I hold and process as a barrister. My registered address is Temple Garden Chambers, 1 Harcourt Buildings, Temple, London, EC4Y 9DA and my registration number is Z4640598.
Data Collection
All of the information that I hold about you is provided to me or gathered solely in the course of and for the purposes of your case, proceedings or any related matter.
Lawful Basis For Processing Your Information
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires all organisations that process personal data to have a Lawful Basis for doing so. The Lawful Bases identified in the GDPR are:
Examples Of Legitimate Interests
My Lawful Basis is Legitimate Interest namely the provision of professional services to you and the proper exercise of my professional obligations and responsibilities. My Lawful Bases may also include: consent and/or performance of a contract with you or steps to enter a contract with you and/or compliance with a legal obligation. In so far as I process sensitive personal data that is necessary in relation to legal proceedings and/or obtaining legal advice and/or otherwise for establishing, exercising or defending legal rights and/or for administering justice.
I Use Your Information To
I do not use automated decision-making in the processing of your personal data.
I collect and process both personal data and special categories of personal data as defined in the GDPR. This includes:
I May Share Your Personal Data With:
Transfers To Third Countries & International Organisations
I do not transfer any personal data to third countries or international organisations.
Retention
I retain your personal data while you remain a client and for as long as in necessary for me to meet my legal and professional obligations. My Retention and Disposal Policy (copy available on request) details how long I hold data for and how I dispose of it when it no longer needs to be held.
Your Rights
The General Data Protection Regulation gives you specific rights around your personal data. For example, you have to be informed about the information I hold and what I use it for, you can ask for a copy of the personal information I hold about you, you can ask me to correct any inaccuracies with the personal data I hold, you can ask me to stop sending you direct mail, or emails, or in some circumstances ask me to stop processing your details.
Finally, if I do something irregular or improper with your personal data you can seek compensation for any distress you are caused or loss you have incurred. You can find out more information from the ICO’s website and this is the organisation that you can complain to if you are unhappy with how I dealt with you.
Accessing & Correcting Your Information
You may request access to, correction of, or a copy of your information by contacting me in writing at my registered address.
Marketing Opt-Outs
You may opt out of receiving emails and other messages from my Chambers by following the instructions in those messages.
Cookies
Cookies are small text files that are stored on your browser or device by websites, apps, online media, and advertisements. The Chambers website use cookies to:
I May Update My Privacy Notice
When I make significant changes, I will publish the updated notice on my website profile.
Updated: 01/11/2022
Keith Morton KC
Keith Morton KC has a long-established practice in the fields of regulatory crime, in particular corporate and gross negligence manslaughter, health and safety offences, inquests, public inquiries and related public law proceedings. He has significant experience of aviation, marine and other transport related proceedings.
He has a distinguished reputation and is recognised as one of the leading practitioner in these fields. He is recommended by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 in Band 1 in the fields of health and safety, inquest and inquiries. In October 2017, he was named ‘Health & Safety Silk of the Year’ at the Chambers & Partners UK Bar Awards, for which he has also been short listed on two other occasions.
Keith has been instructed in some of the most significant health and safety cases, inquest and inquiries in recent years. His clients range from individuals to partnerships, SMEs, large national and multi-national corporations together with local and national government and other public bodies.
More generally, Keith’s practice also encompasses civil common law with a particular focus on personal injury. He is accustomed to dealing with complex civil litigation. Before taking Silk Keith was a long-standing member of the Attorney General’s A Panel of Treasury Counsel.
Keith Morton KC is one of the leading Silks in health and safety related investigations and prosecutions, including corporate and gross negligence manslaughter. He is recommended in this field by both Chambers and Partners UK Bar and Legal 500 in Band 1. In 2017 he was named ‘Health & Safety Silk of the Year’ at the Chambers & Partners UK Bar Awards. He has been shortlisted on two other occasions.
Although he acted for the prosecution in his first significant case (the Heathrow Tunnel collapse) he has since focussed on acting for defendants and those at risk of prosecution. Keith has been instructed in many significant cases including, the Ladbroke Grove Rail Crash, the death of PC Sidhu (first prosecution of a police force for health and safety offences), Stockwell Shooting, R v Cotswold Geotechnical Ltd (first prosecution for statutory offence of corporate manslaughter), R v Tata Steel UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Crim 704 (first successful appeal by a very large organisation sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines) and the on-going Grenfell Tower investigation.
R (HSE) v Nicholas Prest and Anthea Prest (Newport Crown Court, 2025)
Keith Morton KC successfully defended Mr & Mrs Prest, accused of health and safety breaches after a self-employed gardener died when a quad bike with a rear-mounted spray tank overturned. The prosecution case was that the work of the gardener (and others) formed part of their farming Partnership’s undertaking, whereas the defence case was that the work was domestic and unrelated to the Partnership’s undertaking and, in any event, that they had done all that was reasonably practicable. The case was unusual in that in addition to an alleged breach of section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, the HSE also alleged breach of section 4 (which is rarely prosecuted). Further, HSE elected to prosecute Mr and Mrs Prest in their capacity as partners in the Partnership, and not the Partnership itself. After a two-week trial, the jury returned unanimous Not Guilty verdicts.
R v Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd (2025)
Keith successfully defended Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited against charges brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) following a fatal incident in Hertfordshire. An employee of Ringway, part of an Emergency Stand-by Crew, was tragically killed when struck by a drug-driver. The driver was prosecuted and imprisoned. The HSE then alleged that Ringway had failed to do all that was reasonably practicable to ensure the safety of its employees and non-employees (road users) when undertaking Emergency Stand-by work on high-speed dual carriageways across Hertfordshire. After a 14-day trial at St Albans Crown Court, the jury unanimously acquitted Ringway of all charges.
R (HSE) v SnowDome Ltd (2025)
Represented SnowDome Ltd in the HSE investigation and prosecution arising out of the death of a child while tobogganing at an indoor ski centre.
R (Office of Product Safety & Standards) v Glen Dimplex Home Appliances Limited (on-going)
Keith is instructed in this prosecution in which it is alleged the defendant placed gas oven products on the market contrary to the Gas Appliances (Enforcement) and Miscellaneous Amendments Regulations 2018. Case is listed for trial in 2027.
R (Office of Road and Rail) v Transport for London and Tram Operations Limited and another (2024)
Keith represented TfL in the prosecution following the Croydon Tram disaster. Of 69 passengers, 7 died, and 62 sustained injuries (of which 19 sustained very serious injuries). This was the first tram incident in the United Kingdom in which passengers had died since 1959. TfL and Tram Operations Limited pleaded guilty. The driver was prosecuted and acquitted at trial. The Companies were sentenced by Fraser J over a 3 day sentencing hearing in July 2024.
Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited v Sarah Bird, one of His Majesty’s Inspectors of Health and Safety (2024)
Keith represented Ringway in its successful appeal against an Improvement Notice issued by the Inspector following a collision between a drug-driver and one of its employees on a high-speed dual carriageway in which the Inspector contended the company’s risk assessment was not suitable and sufficient.
R v Bowmer & Kirkland (2021)
Keith secured the acquittal of the company following an 8 day trial before the District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) at Derby Magistrates Court. The case turned on the nature and scope of the duty owned by a Principal Contractor under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015
R v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2021)
Keith acted for the local authority in this especially tragic case in which a young child died while using play equipment in one of the local authority’s parks.
R v X Construction Company Limited (2020)
Keith secured a reduction of almost quarter of a million pounds on appeal for a very large construction company following its guilty plea to a charge under section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
R v Mick George Limited (2019) EWCA Crim 519
Successful appeal to the Court of Appeal. Keith secured a 40% reduction in the fine imposed for breach of Regulation 25(3) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015.
R v Rose Builders Limited (2019)
Prosecution contended for a fine of £2.5m but the judge accepted all of the mitigation advanced and imposed a fine of £225k.
R v BAM Construction Limited (2017)
Keith represented BAM Construction Limited at a month long trial in which the Company was acquitted of failing to comply with its duties under Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and Regulation 22 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007.
R v Dicky Birds Nursery Limited (2016)
Keith represented the nursery in a prosecution following the tragic death of a 22 month old child, who choked on a jelly cube during sensory play.
R v Dynamiq Cleaning Limited (2015)
Keith secured the acquittal of the company who it was alleged had failed to ensure the safety at work of its employees following an accident at Edgware Bus Depot in which a cleaner suffered serious injury. The company was acquitted following a two week trial at the Central Criminal Court
R v N Limited and Another [2008] 1 WLR 2684
Leading case on the correct approach to and timing of a submission of no case in a health and safety prosecution
Recommended in Band 1 UK Bar by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500. Keith sits as an Assistant Coroner.
Prominent and high profile inquest cases include: the 7/7 London Bombings Inquests, a number of child death inquests (including choking and play equipment cases), Inquests into the deaths of 3 SAS reservist while training on the Brecon Beacons, the Vauxhall Helicopter crash, inquests in deaths of air crew said to be attributable to cabin air toxicity, inquests into food allergy related deaths, the Shoreham Air Show crash, the Emiliano Sala Inquest and the Croydon Tram Crash inquests. Keith as also acted as Counsel to Inquests.
For inquest public law related cases see separate section below.
Leicester City King Power Stadium Helicopter Crash Inquest (2025)
The inquests into the deaths of Leicester City Football Club owner Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha, along with two of his staff, Nursara Suknamai and Kaveporn Punpare, pilots Eric Swaffer and Izabela Roza Lechowicz. The helicopter crashed shortly after take-off from the Stadium. A duplex bearing associated with the tail rotor seized depriving the pilot of the ability to control the aircraft. The jury returned a conclusion of Accident and a narrative.
Keith Morton KC was instructed on behalf of the Civil Aviation Authority.
Inquest into the death of Wayne Brown (2025)
Keith represented the West Midlands Fire service at the inquest into the death of Wayne Brown, the UK’s first black chief fire officer who took his own life following allegations of harassment and allegations related to his qualifications
Inquest into the death of Lyla Windell (2025)
Lyla tragically died after choking on food at a nursery, despite the best efforts of the staff. Keith represented the nursery
Inquests into Three Drownings in Cornwall During COVID lockdowns
Three men drowned in separate incidents in the sea at Treyarnon Bay, Porthcurno, and Church Cove in Cornwall. The deaths occurred during the Covid lockdowns in 2020, when RNLI lifeguard services were suspended due to pandemic restrictions. The inquests considered whether in the absence of any common law duty on landowners to provide lifeguards on beaches the coroner should issue a prevention of future death report. The coroner was persuaded that would not be appropriate in circumstances where both domestic and European law are clear there is no such duty. Keith represented The National Trust who owned (part of) the beaches concerned.
Inquest in to the death of Jacob Billington (2024)
Jacob Billington was fatally stabbed during a series of unprovoked attacks in Birmingham city centre. The perpetrator, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, had been released from prison months earlier without mental health support. Keith represented a Health Board that provided mental health in reach services at a prison housing the perpetrator immediately prior to his release just as the Covid lockdown came into force.
Inquest in to the Death of Oliver Steeper (2024)
Keith represented the nursery in this tragic case in which a nine-month-old child tragically died after choking on food. The coroner concluded that there was “no evidence which would show failures by nursery or its staff”.
Inquest into the death of Jean Langan (2024)
Jean Langan died as she made her way across the car park at Derriford Hospital when she was struck by the downwash of an incoming helicopter landing at the hospital’s helipad. Keith was instructed by the Civil Aviation Authority
Inquest into the Death of John Coles (2023)
Keith represented Heathrow Airport Limited in this fatal airside road traffic collision. The case involved difficult factual and expert evidence concerning visibility and visual interference airside at the country’s major airport.
Inquest into the death of Lauren Bridges (2023)
Lauren Bridges, who was from Dorset, was an “out of area” patent detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act in the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit at the Priory Hospital Cheadle Royal, near Manchester, which was 260 miles from her home. Lauren, then aged 20, was found unresponsive on 24 February 2022 and died on 26 February 2022 at Wythenshawe Hospital. The jury found that she did not intend to end her life and concluded her death was misadventure.
Inquest into the death of Dr Nicholas Harrison (2023)
Dr Harrison was killed by his son, who was suffering from mental illness. His family sought medical attention for him over several months. He was detained under the Mental Health Act but absconded from the ward. He then made his way to his parents’ home where he killed his father. The inquest raised complex factual, expert, and procedural issues. Keith acted for Swansea Bay University Health Board.
Shoreham Airshow Inquests (2022)
Instructed by the Civil Aviation Authority in the Inquests in the deaths of 11 people on 22 August 2015, when a Hawker Hunter participating in the Shoreham Air Show crashed onto the A27. The Senior Coroner concluded that the deceased were unlawfully killed.
Celia Marsh Inquest (2022)
Keith represented Planet Coconut in the Inquest into the death of Celia Marsh who suffered an allergic reaction to a wrap purchased from Pret a Manger.
Emiliano Sala Inquest (2022)
Keith represented the Civil Aviation Authority in the Inquest into the death of Emiliano Sala, the professional footballer, who died when the aircraft he was flown in crashed en route from Nantes to Cardiff.
Croydon Tram Inquests (2021)
Represented Transport for London at the inquests into the deaths of seven people killed in the Croydon Tram crash at Sandilands on 9 November 2016.
Vauxhall Helicopter Crash Inquest
Keith acted for the Civil Aviation Authority at the Inquest into this high profile case in which a helicopter collided with a crane on top of St Georges Wharf Tower, then under construction in Vauxhall.
Inquest into the death of Tiya Chauhan
Keith acted for the nursery in this tragic case in which a 22 month child choked on a cube of jelly.
Recommended in Band 1 UK Bar by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500.
Prominent and high profile public inquiries include: The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry (counsel for Thames Trains), the D Article 2 Inquiry (counsel to the Inquiry), the (first) Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry (counsel to the Inquiry), The Grenfell Tower Fire Inquiry (counsel for directors of one of the core participants), advice in relation to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry.
UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry
Public Inquiry in relation to Covid-19, in particular Module 2 in respect Decision Making and Political Governance. Acted for two prominent politicians.
Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry
Represented a Director of a major construction company
The Cranston Inquiry
Keith was retained to advise a client in respect of issues arising from the establishment of the inquiry
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Keith was retained to advise one of the core participants on discrete issues arising in the course of the Inquiry
The (First) Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry
Keith was instructed as Counsel to the Inquiry in Sir Robert Francis’s initial public inquiry resulting in a recommendation for the further and more expensive public inquiry
The D Inquiry
Counsel to the Inquiry. D attempted suicide in prison that very nearly succeeded. This was the first public inquiry into a case of “near” suicide. The court of appeal held in R (on the application of D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 143 that the facts required public examination in order for the state to meet its Article 2 procedural obligations.
Ladbrook Grove Rail Inquiry
Keith was instructed as Junior counsel for Thames Trains
Keith Morton KC public law cases date back to his time as a junior on the Attorney General’s A Panel of Treasury Counsel. His more recent public law work has been related to his other core practice areas.
R (on the application of Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service) v HM Assistant Coroner for Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire [2023] EWHC 1669 (Admin)
Keith successfully represented the Marine Accident Investigation Branch in a judicial review challenge brought by the Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service against a Coroner’s ruling in the light of Secretary of State for Transport v Senior Coroner for Norfolk [2016] EWHC 2279 (Admin) (in which Keith appeared for the Secretary of State, see below).
The judicial review arose out of an inquest into the death of a fire fighter who died in a marine training exercise. The accident was investigated by the MAIB (one of the State’s three Accident Investigation Branches). The MAIB found that there were shortcomings in the planning and operation of the training exercise both locally and systemically. In Norfolk the Divisional Court held that a coroner should accept the findings of an AIB investigation unless they are arguably incomplete, flawed or deficient. The Fire Service contended before the Coroner that the MAIB’s investigation was arguably incomplete, flawed or deficient. The Coroner did not agree. The Fire Service challenged that decision in this judicial review. Eyre J rejected all of the Fire Service’s grounds. The judgment is significant because it illustrates the practical application of Norfolk and the high bar that must be crossed to establish an AIB investigation is arguably incomplete, flawed or deficient and because it is authority for the proposition that the relevant part of the decision in Norfolk formed the ratio of that decision.
R (Secretary of State) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Norfolk (British Airline Pilots intervening) [2016] EWHC 2279 (Admin)
Keith represented the Air Accident Investigation Branch in this leading case on the inter-relationship between inquests and investigations by the state’s independent specialist investigators. This has become the leading case on the conduct of inquests where there has been an investigation by one of the state’s Accident Investigation Branches. The case establishes there must be no duplication of inquiry unless there is evidence the AIB’s investigation was incomplete, flawed or deficient. Later cases (see below) have considered the practical application of this principle.
R (OCS Group UK Limited) v Health & Safety Executive
Successful judicial review proceedings challenging the HSE’s dispute process for challenging findings of contravention and fees issued under the Fee for Intervention (FFI) scheme and two specific notices. This judicial review resulted in a settlement whereby the HSE introduced an independent appeals process
University of Southampton v Mohtasham [2012] EWHC 3795 (QB)
Keith represented the University of Southampton in proceedings for injunctive relief and subsequently in committal proceedings arising out of the defendant’s false allegations of sexual harassment, discrimination and plagiarism
R (on the application of Secretary of State for Defence) v Pensions Appeal Tribunal [2007] EWHC 1177 (Admin) and [2008] EWHC 3248 (Admin)
Keith represented the Secretary of State in a serious of cases relating to the jurisdiction of the Pensions Appeal Tribunal to hear appeals lodged out of time
Keith’s practice has led to particular experience in aviation cases. He is now regarded as one of the country’s leading silks for aviation related fatalities. He has extensive experience representing clients in a wide range of high-profile aviation matters, including inquests, civil private and public law claims, and regulatory proceedings
Leicester City King Power Stadium Helicopter Crash Inquest (2025)
The inquests into the deaths of Leicester City Football Club owner Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha, along with two of his staff, Nursara Suknamai and Kaveporn Punpare, pilots Eric Swaffer and Izabela Roza Lechowicz. The helicopter crashed shortly after take-off from the Stadium. A duplex bearing associated with the tail rotor seized depriving the pilot of the ability to control the aircraft. The jury returned a conclusion of Accident and a narrative.
Keith Morton KC was instructed on behalf of the Civil Aviation Authority.
Inquest into the death of Jean Langan (2024)
Jean Langan died as she made her way across the car park at Derriford Hospital when she was struck by the downwash of an incoming helicopter landing at the hospital’s helipad. Keith was instructed by the Civil Aviation Authority.
Shoreham Airshow Inquests (2022)
Instructed by the Civil Aviation Authority in the Inquests in the deaths of 11 people on 22 August 2015, when a Hawker Hunter participating in the Shoreham Air Show crashed onto the A27. The Senior Coroner concluded that the deceased were unlawfully killed.
Emiliano Sala Inquest (2022)
Keith represented the Civil Aviation Authority in the Inquest into the death of Emiliano Sala, the professional footballer, who died when the aircraft he was flown in crashed enroute from Nantes to Cardiff.
R (Secretary of State) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Norfolk (British Airline Pilots intervening) [2016] EWHC 2279 (Admin)
Keith represented the Air Accident Investigation Branch in this leading case on the inter-relationship between inquests and investigations by the state’s independent specialist investigators. This has become the leading case on the conduct of inquests where there has been an investigation by one of the state’s Accident Investigation Branches. The case establishes there must be no duplication of inquiry unless there is evidence the AIB’s investigation was incomplete, flawed or deficient. Later cases (see above) have considered the practical application of this principle.
Vauxhall Helicopter Crash Inquest
Keith acted for the Civil Aviation Authority at the Inquest into this high profile case in which a helicopter collided with a crane on top of St Georges Wharf Tower, then under construction in Vauxhall.
Keith Morton KC has extensive experience representing both claimants and defendants in personal injury cases, particularly those involving serious and fatal injuries. As a junior on the Attorney General’s A Panel of Treasury Counsel he routinely represented the Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Justice and the Home Office in serious personal injury cases. His more recent cases in Silk include representing a local authority in a multi-defendant action where a child suffered catastrophic injuries in a school playground accident, and acting for the claimant in a case involving a senior army officer injured during joint training exercises in Kuwait. He has also represented claimants in cases involving assaults by fellow soldiers and injuries sustained during military service.
Various claimants v A local authority
Keith is representing a local authority in claims brought by various claimants arising out of the death of a man who was killed by a man suffering from schizophrenia. He was acquitted of murder by reason of insanity.
A child v A local authority and others
Keith represented the local authority in a multi-defendant action in which the claimant suffered catastrophic injuries in a school playground. The action arose from work that had been undertaken in the course of major building and refurbishment work at the school and gave rise to complex liability and indemnity issues between defendants.
Warnock v Ministry of Justice
Keith represented the claimant who was assaulted by another soldier in their barracks using a machete obtained from Army stores. Issues of vicarious and directly liability hotly contested until shortly before trial.
A Senior Officer v Ministry of Defence
Keith represented the claimant who was an officer serving in Kuwait undertaking integrated desert training exercises with the Kuwaiti Army and Airforce. He suffered serious injury when the vehicle he was travelling in was sliced open by the undercarriage of a low flying Kuwait Apache Helicopter. The MoD denied liability, but a favourable settlement was achieved on liability and quantum.
Re the deaths of SAS soldiers who died during training (2016)
Keith represented the father of one of the deceased soldiers in the civil claim which followed the inquest (see also inquest cases).
Cox v Ministry of Justice [2014] QB 107
Keith represented the MoJ in this significant case considering the reach of vicariously liability of the Ministry of Justice for the negligent act of a prisoner resulting in injury to a prison officer.
Monk v Cann Hall Primary School and Essex County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 826
Keith represented the claimant on appeal. The decision of the Court of Appeal is significant for its consideration of the relationship between damages for unfair dismissal and common law damages for negligence causing person injury in the context of a dismissal and the proper approach to a strike out application.
Macintyre v Ministry of Defence [2012] EWHC 1690 QB
Keith represented the defendant in its successful defence to this claim arising out of serious injury sustained by an officer in the course of a mountain climbing accident during adventure training in the Alps.
Uren v Corporate Leisure (UK) Ltd and the Ministry of Defence [2010] EWHC 46 (QB) (first trial) [2011] EWCA Civ 66 (appeal) and [2013] EWHC 353 (QB) (second trial)
Keith was junior counsel for the Ministry of Defence in this personal injury action arising out of a leisure activity voluntarily undertaken in the course of employment resulting in grave injury. The case gave rise to important issues relating to the relevance of risk assessments to liability, the relationship between the duty of employers and their specialist contractors and the proper approach to expert evidence.
Independent Report recommends reversal of the Supreme Court decision in Maughan as it relates to unlawful killing conclusions in inquests On 23 October 2025, the Home Office and Ministry of Justice published the recommendations arising from the ‘Rapid Review’ of…
A self-employed gardener died when he was crushed under a quad bike (also known as an all-terrain vehicle) he was operating. He had been provided with the quad bike together with a rear mounted spray tank to undertake herbicide spraying….
An employee of Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited, working as a member of an Emergency Stand-by Crew, was killed by a drug-driver while responding to a reported hazard on a high-speed dual carriageway in Hertfordshire. The driver pleaded guilty to various…
The inquests into the deaths of Leicester City Football Club owner Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha, along with two of his staff, Nursara Suknamai and Kaveporn Punpare, pilots Eric Swaffer and Izabela Roza Lechowicz, concludes. The helicopter crashed shortly after take-off from the…
Thank you for choosing to instruct me in your case. I will need to collect and hold your personal information in order to represent you. I will take all reasonable steps to protect your personal information. I will do all that I reasonably can to ensure I do not infringe your rights or undermine your trust. This Privacy Notice describes the information I collect about you, how it is used and shared, and your rights regarding it.
Data Controller
I am registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) as a Data Controller for the personal data that I hold and process as a barrister. My registered address is Temple Garden Chambers, 1 Harcourt Buildings, Temple, London, EC4Y 9DA and my registration number is Z4640598.
Data Collection
All of the information that I hold about you is provided to me or gathered solely in the course of and for the purposes of your case, proceedings or any related matter.
Lawful Basis For Processing Your Information
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires all organisations that process personal data to have a Lawful Basis for doing so. The Lawful Bases identified in the GDPR are:
Examples Of Legitimate Interests
My Lawful Basis is Legitimate Interest namely the provision of professional services to you and the proper exercise of my professional obligations and responsibilities. My Lawful Bases may also include: consent and/or performance of a contract with you or steps to enter a contract with you and/or compliance with a legal obligation. In so far as I process sensitive personal data that is necessary in relation to legal proceedings and/or obtaining legal advice and/or otherwise for establishing, exercising or defending legal rights and/or for administering justice.
I Use Your Information To
I do not use automated decision-making in the processing of your personal data.
I collect and process both personal data and special categories of personal data as defined in the GDPR. This includes:
I May Share Your Personal Data With:
Transfers To Third Countries & International Organisations
I do not transfer any personal data to third countries or international organisations.
Retention
I retain your personal data while you remain a client and for as long as in necessary for me to meet my legal and professional obligations. My Retention and Disposal Policy (copy available on request) details how long I hold data for and how I dispose of it when it no longer needs to be held.
Your Rights
The General Data Protection Regulation gives you specific rights around your personal data. For example, you have to be informed about the information I hold and what I use it for, you can ask for a copy of the personal information I hold about you, you can ask me to correct any inaccuracies with the personal data I hold, you can ask me to stop sending you direct mail, or emails, or in some circumstances ask me to stop processing your details.
Finally, if I do something irregular or improper with your personal data you can seek compensation for any distress you are caused or loss you have incurred. You can find out more information from the ICO’s website and this is the organisation that you can complain to if you are unhappy with how I dealt with you.
Accessing & Correcting Your Information
You may request access to, correction of, or a copy of your information by contacting me in writing at my registered address.
Marketing Opt-Outs
You may opt out of receiving emails and other messages from my Chambers by following the instructions in those messages.
Cookies
Cookies are small text files that are stored on your browser or device by websites, apps, online media, and advertisements. The Chambers website use cookies to:
I May Update My Privacy Notice
When I make significant changes, I will publish the updated notice on my website profile.
Updated: 01/11/2022
