News & Resources

German EAWs: Divisional Court approves local courts as ‘judicial authorities’

11th May 2020

On 6 May 2020 Judgment was handed down in the case of Shirnakhy & Anr v Weiden Local Court & Anr [2020] EWHC 1103, in which Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Mr Justice Lewis considered whether local courts (Amtsgerichte) in Germany were competent judicial authorities within the meaning of Article 6(1) and 6(3) of the Framework Decision, and so able to issue European Arrest Warrants (EAWs).

The issue arose following the judgment of the CJEU in OG and PI, in which it held that German public prosecutors were not ‘judicial authorities’ because they may be influenced by instructions issued by the executive. Following that decision, EAWs issued by German public prosecutors were withdrawn and were replaced in most instances with warrants issued by local courts.

Article 6(1) requires issuing judicial authorities to be competent ‘by virtue of the law’ of the requesting state. The Applicants relied upon expert evidence which showed that according to German law there was no clear basis for local courts to issue EAWs. Accordingly, some local courts had refused applications to issue EAWs.

Further, the Applicants argued that the requirement in Article 6(3) that member states inform the Council of the competent judicial authority was a mandatory requirement. At the time the EAWs were issued, the German authorities had not made the necessary notification. The Applicants sought a preliminary reference to the CJEU on both points.

The Respondents’ position was that German law did provide a sufficiently clear basis for the issue of EAWs by local courts and that notification was not a mandatory requirement. A reference on either point was unnecessary.

The Divisional Court held that there was no doubt as to the ability of the German local courts to issue EAWs. Further, notification pursuant to Article 6(3) was not a mandatory requirement. The Court declined to make a reference on either point, holding that the meaning of Articles 6(1) and (3) were acte clair.

Émilie Pottle was instructed by Stephen Fidler & Co for the first Applicant, Juliet Wells was instructed by Armstrong Solicitors for the Second Applicant.

What Next?
This is the latest in a slew of cases challenging EAWs on the basis that the authorities who issued them are not judicial authorities within the meaning of the Framework Decision. It seems likely that further challenges will be made in the near future. A reference to the CJEU was made by the Divisional Court in the case of VA, concerning the issue of whether the Bulgarian public prosecutor was capable of being a judicial authority within the meaning of the Framework Decision.





Related Barristers

Émilie Pottle

Émilie Pottle
Year of Call: 2008

Juliet Wells

Juliet Wells
Year of Call: 2016


Close X

Coronavirus Update

TGC continues proactively to safeguard against the risks posed by the spread of Coronavirus. We have a working Committee who continue to monitor the situation and follow advice issued by the Government and Public Health England. We will be updating this page as and when new information becomes available.

As of 25th March, our London premises, 1 Harcourt Buildings has been closed until further notice and all barristers, clerks and support staff will be working remotely.

We wish to reassure everyone that our contingency plans we have put in place enable us to continue to provide our services.

Telephoning us

When calling our switchboard number, it will be diverted to a member of the clerking team who will be able to assist in the usual way.  All direct dials in Chambers are being diverted to be answered remotely.

Emailing us & Sending Instructions

Please send all instructions via email directly to clerks@tgchambers.com we would be grateful if this could be sent in an orderly fashion to enable working from a screen manageable.  We are unable to receive hard copy instructions via DX or Post until further notice, unless specific arrangements are made in advance by contacting the clerks.

Please continue to communicate with barristers directly via email.

Conferences, Joint Settlement Meetings & Mediations

All conferences, meetings and mediations will take remotely, either by telephone or via video until further notice.  Group Telephone calls and video calls can be easily arranged.

Court Hearings

We are following The Government’s advice closely, which is changing daily. In keeping with Government advice, we will continue to service hearings remotely, where possible and as instructed by the hosting Court. The judiciary has made provision for some civil cases to be heard remotely, with lawyers being required to take part in virtual hearings.

We will continue to closely monitor this situation.

Making a payment

If you do not already pay us by BACS, going forward please make arrangements to do so. Please contact the clerks who can supply you with the relevant BACS details.

If you wish to discuss our policy and procedure relating to coronavirus, please do not hesitate to contact our senior clerk Dean Norton on 07535 753098 or dnorton@tgchambers.com

To learn more visit our Covid-19 Information page.