News & Resources

Master Leonard dismisses reasonableness and proportionality challenge to post-LASPO ATE premium in clinical negligence case

23rd August 2017

Matt Waszak, instructed by Irwin Mitchell, appeared for the claimant in successfully resisting a challenge to the reasonableness and proportionality of a post-LASPO ATE premium. Master Leonard handed down judgment on Monday in the case of Mitchell v Gilling-Smith [2017] EWHC B18 (Costs). The judgment can be read below.

The ATE premium was incurred in the claimant’s claim for the negligent treatment of an ovarian endometrioma, which settled for £200,000. At detailed assessment, the defendant argued that the premium was not reasonably incurred; was not reasonable in amount; and was disproportionate under CPR 44.3(5). The Master dismissed the defendant’s challenges and allowed the premium in full.

In particular:
·         In relation to the application of the new proportionality test to additional liabilities, the Master held that, while awaiting guidance from the Court of Appeal, it was not necessary to set out a considered view of his own on the issue. That was because even if the proportionality of the insurance premium could be considered in isolation, the premium could not be said to be disproportionate in the context of a clinical negligence claim which settled for £200,000.
·         It was reasonable for the claimant to have taken out the ATE policy as soon as it was clear that the case was going to proceed. Master Leonard rejected the argument that it was incumbent upon the claimant’s solicitors to wait until a point at which they had a clear understanding of the level of recoverable ATE which was going to be required by the claimant.
·         The Master dismissed the challenge to the reasonableness of the premium, finding that there was no real evidence to support the proposition that suitable, less expensive alternative policies were available to the claimant. The Master followed the approaches of Simon J (as he then was) in Kris Motor Spares v Fox Williams LLP [2010] EWHC (1008) QB and Langstaff J in Pollard v University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust [2017] 1 Costs LR 45.

Download PDF

Related Barristers

Matthew Waszak

Matthew Waszak
Year of Call: 2012

Close X

TEMPLE GARDEN CHAMBERS is a market leading set with recognised excellence in a myriad of practice areas with awarded leaders in twelve specialist areas. TGC has the privilege of being well placed in the Temple and The Hague with superb facilities.

Currently consisting of 17 silks and 60 juniors with outstanding leadership and a long established clerking team acknowledged for their exceptional client services and business development, we are keen to expand upon our key areas.

To accommodate the growth in our core practice areas we are inviting applications from established practitioners and/or teams to further enhance our excellent reputation in the following fields:

• Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence
• Inquests & Inquiries
• Health & Safety
• Costs & Litigation Funding

TGC is widely recognised for its friendly ethos and its commitment to Equality & Diversity and Wellbeing. We are especially keen to encourage applications from underrepresented groups at the bar – women, people with disabilities, those from ethnic minority groups and members of the LGBTQ+ community.

Applications will be treated with the strictest confidence and should be addressed to the Head of Chambers, Keith Morton QC

In advance of any formal application both Keith Morton QC and Dean Norton (Senior Clerk) would be delighted to have a confidential discussion. To arrange a meeting please contact Dean on 020 7842 8641 or