News & Resources

When It Is Reasonable To Run Someone Over…

28th January 2019

James Arney, instructed by Horwich Farrelly, acted for the Defendants in a 3-day trial relating to liability only, against Richard Norton, instructed by Irwin Mitchell. The Defendant collided with the Claimant pedestrian in the car park of McDonald’s, causing him serious injuries. James Arney successfully argued that the Defendant was not negligent because the Defendant’s car was under attack.

The Defendant was one of a group of young people who travelled to McDonald’s in two cars. The Defendant, driving a Volkswagen Polo, was carrying two female passengers, while the other, a Ford Fiesta, contained two males and one female passenger. An altercation ensued inside the McDonald’s between the Defendant’s group and a large group of young Asian males. The Defendant’s group returned to their respective vehicles, followed outside by a number of Asian males.

The Claimant and his friend (two older Asian males) were parked in the bay next to the Fiesta. One of the passengers in the Fiesta made a loud racially provocative comment upon returning to their vehicle, causing some of the group of Asian males to run towards the parked vehicles. The Claimant’s friend reacted to the abuse by getting out of his car and remonstrating with the driver of the Fiesta, shouting and swearing at the driver to get out of his vehicle. One of the group managed to pull open the front passenger door of the Fiesta, while others kicked and hit the vehicle as it was reversing out of the parking bay before driving forwards and away from the scene.

The Claimant’s friend then turned his attention to the Polo to remonstrate with the Defendant, shouting and swearing at him to get out of his vehicle and fight. Despite the Defendant trying to reason with him, the Claimant’s friend got as far as opening the driver’s door and grabbing the Defendant’s arm in order to drag him out, while the group of Asian males surrounded the vehicle. The Claimant had exited his vehicle to calm down his friend, and was by now positioned in front of the Defendant’s car. Fearing for his safety and that of his female passengers, hoping and expecting that the Claimant would move out the way, the Defendant floored his accelerator to escape the attacking group.

Mr Justice Turner held the Claimant’s friend to be an unreliable witness, who was argumentative under cross examination and prone to volatility when challenged.

The Claimant’s Counsel attempted, after the conclusion of evidence, to render the evidence in the police records inadmissible, despite them forming part of the agreed Trial Bundle. The Claimant had overlooked Charnock v Rowan [2012] EWCA Civ 2 and PD 32, 27.2. The Court held that the evidence was admissible, their status as hearsay going to weight rather than admissibility.

Mr Justice Turner held that the Defendant was in genuine fear for his safety and that of his two female passengers. These were not circumstances in which the reasonable man could be expected to weight to a nicety the relative risks involved in choosing between the options open to him. The fact that he accelerated away at speed was reasonable and understandable in these particular circumstances. The Defendant acted in a way which did not fall below the standard of a reasonable driver placed in the threatening and rapidly developing situation in which he found himself.

Please click here to view Judgment.





Related Barristers

James Arney

James Arney
Year of Call: 1992


Close X

Coronavirus Update

TGC continues proactively to safeguard against the risks posed by the spread of Coronavirus. We have a Covid-19 Committee who continue to monitor the situation and follow advice issued by the Government and Public Health England. We will be updating this page as and when new information becomes available. As of 6 July 2020, our London premises, 1 Harcourt Buildings, will be operating with a reduced clerking team in attendance. The remaining staff members and barristers will continue working remotely. We wish to reassure everyone that our contingency plans enable us to continue to provide our services.

Telephoning us

When calling our switchboard number, it will be diverted to a member of the clerking team who will be able to assist in the usual way. All direct dials in Chambers are diverted to be answered remotely.

Emailing us & Sending Instructions

Please send all instructions via email directly to clerks@tgchambers.com. We would be grateful if this could be sent in an orderly fashion to enable working from a screen manageable. We are able to receive hard copy instructions via DX or Post, if necessary. However, we have a preference for electronic documents wherever possible.

Please continue to communicate with barristers directly via phone or email.

Conferences, Joint Settlement Meetings & Mediations

Conferences, meetings and mediations will take place remotely, either by telephone or video until further notice. Group Telephone calls and video calls can be easily arranged. If an in-person meeting is felt necessary please see our Covid-19 Information page for full criteria.

Court Hearings

We are following the Government’s advice closely, which is changing daily. In keeping with that advice, we will continue to service hearings remotely, where possible and as instructed by the hosting Court. In-Person hearings will be accommodated by members of TGC. We will continue to monitor this situation.

Making a payment

If you do not already pay us by BACS, going forward please make arrangements to do so. Please contact the clerks who can supply you with the relevant BACS details.

If you wish to discuss our policy and procedure relating to coronavirus, please do not hesitate to contact our senior clerk Dean Norton on 07535 753098 or dnorton@tgchambers.com.

To learn more visit our Covid-19 Information page.